Brian Tyler Cohen - So You Say You Want Truth...

https://www.youtube.com/@briantylercohen

Weekly Interest



332 Landslide

332 Landslide
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts

April 10, 2008

What Independent Voters Want

  • We’re tired of two parties whose priority is acquiring and maintaining power rather than serving the people who voted them into office.
  • We have no problem voting for someone who has no chance of winning.
  • We vote for the person and not the party.
  • We seldom vote a straight, major-party ticket.
  • We are not undecided. We have decided to be independent.
  • We believe that a diversity of opinions stimulates healthy debate.
  • We want dialogue, not diatribes.
  • We want a government that follows the will of the people instead of one that manipulates it.
  • We care as much about what happens on every other day as on Election Day.
  • We want Ralph Nader to keep on running, even if we don’t vote for him. We probably need to apologize for that.
  • We are anti-party, and yet we welcome third-party voters and candidates to join us under the independent umbrella, because they’re also outsiders.
  • We believe the United States is better than this.


A pretty big whopper on it's own:

mw Says: "While people may actually like to think of themselves as “Independent”, what they do in a voting booth is one hell of a lot more important than what they tell pollsters about how how they label themselves."

When the parties take the measures they have to keep people off the ballot, leaving no other names there but their own we have little choice as to what we do in the voting booth save not voting at all. Looking at the falling numbers of voters, I'd say they have made one hell of a loud statement!

Another:

mw Says: "The way to read this, is that when an “independent” tells a pollster which way they “lean”, they are actually saying “this is how I vote”. "

What part of the writers statement didn't you understand? "nor are we “party-leaning.” The polls you are referring to do not have real questions and a real category for people who are not of one party or the other, in order to give indication of our issues we answer in the manner which will get our points across. It is the pollsters and people like you that push us into a lean, that force us into your mold of leaners.

So here is OUR definition, every person on your census that hasn't registered yet to vote, every person who has registered and hasn't recently voted, every person who recently removed themselves from the R or the D party and every single person who votes on issues not party affiliation, THOSE people are your Independents. That is how many, exactly, you need to consider Independent Voters.

April 6, 2008

New Anti-Evolution Film Stirs Controversy | LiveScience

"Some scientists, however, are outraged about the conduct of the filmmaker during production and screening as well as the film's effort to tie Darwin's ideas to Hitler. One prominent scientist who is in the movie has since called it shoddy and sinister. "

I am altogether dumbfounded, disappointed and outraged at the published numbers for people claiming to still believe ONLY in creation of man by God within the time frame laid out in the old testament!

I think that it must be (for the sake of my sanity and continued courage to leave the safety of my house) that the only people sponsoring these polls/numbers are the creation backers, targeting other creationists. Possibly adding to the numbers would be the fact that if you do believe in evolution, the stark obviousness, the shear factiness makes it so impossible to imagine that someone else does not understand it's truth. In fact the thought so NEVER enters our minds we stop the discussions, don't bother clicking on the few articles about teaching creation in public schools, and apparently don't fill out polls or surveys.

So, do my sanity the favor of speaking about evolution to your friends, blog about it, investigate it, ANSWER POLLS about it! Below are some sites with polling information (that I cannot vouch for, you check it out) on the subject, have a seat and then take a look. You'll be glad you were sitting.

CBS News '04 survey
Gallup's '07 findings
HarrisInteractive

Ok, so keeping the picture to the left in mind, God created man in His own image. So.... God decided later to try again? (since on their timeline homosapien came first) Or God looked just like some creatures that were already here except wanted a bigger brain? (for those that have begun to accept the timeline) Or you could believe, as the folks at the site the picture links to ponder, that neanderthal are possibly nephilim . Note also that this site extols the virtues of carbon dating technology.

Please, keep your faith, I would not wish anyone to lose their faith. Please have faith that these truths have been brought to light for a reason, as with everything. For every new doubt uttered, another piece of proof is found. Piece after piece, in an ever clearer painting you a picture kind of way. Has there ever been such signs to support your faith?



Ok, just to look through: Berkeley's take ,Some other info .

The Center for Public Integrity

The 380,000-plus-word database presented here allows, for the first time, the Iraq-related public pronouncements of top Bush administration officials to be tracked on a day-by-day basis against their private assessments and the actual “ground truth” as it is now known. Throughout the database, passages containing false statements by the top Bush administration officials are highlighted in yellow. The 935 false statements in the database may also be accessed by selecting the “False Statements” option from the “Subject” pull-down menu and may be displayed within selected date ranges using the selection tool below. Searches may also be limited by person or subject, or both, by using the appropriate selections from the pull-down menus.